In the latest display of authoritarian tyranny, Professor Barnabas Nawangwe, the self-appointed Vice Chancellor of Makerere University, has launched a despicable assault on academic freedom by instigating a witch-hunt against a lecturer daring enough to incorporate real-world examples into a constitutional law exam. This odious decree, fueled by the petty ego of Nawangwe and his cronies, epitomizes the depths of political manipulation poisoning Uganda’s once-respected institution.
The scandal erupted when a straightforward question in a constitutional law exam, referencing a parliamentary debate chaired by Speaker Anita Among, became the target of Nawangwe’s insidious machinations. Instead of embracing the practical application of legal principles, Nawangwe seized the opportunity to flex his dictatorial muscles, ordering a baseless inquiry under the guise of academic standards. Such a ludicrous pretext only serves to expose the true agenda: the suppression of critical thought and the protection of the fragile egos of the ruling elite.
The Makerere University Academic Staff Association (MUASA) and a chorus of outraged academics have rightfully condemned Nawangwe’s actions as an egregious assault on academic freedom. They decry this reprehensible act as yet another example of Nawangwe’s authoritarian interference in academic affairs. Professor Joe Oloka-Onyango, the chief examiner targeted by Nawangwe’s inquisition, rightly boycotted the farcical meeting concocted to discuss this charade, denouncing it as a flagrant violation of academic autonomy. This is not merely a single isolated incident; it is a calculated maneuver to politicize academia and quash dissent.
Nawangwe’s directive reeks of political censorship and intellectual repression. His feeble attempt to cloak his autocratic tendencies under the guise of academic standards is laughable at best. The academic board of the law school has unequivocally affirmed that the exam was meticulously crafted in adherence to established procedures. Professor Christopher Mbaziira, a former principal of the law school, has painstakingly outlined the rigorous process of exam moderation, which ensures compliance with academic standards. Nawangwe’s assault on this process is not a defense of academic integrity; it is a blatant affront to it.
This incident is symptomatic of a broader malaise plaguing Ugandan universities—a toxic cocktail of political interference and institutional decay. The delicate balance between academic standards and academic freedom is teetering on the brink of collapse, crushed beneath the weight of administrative overreach and fear-induced conformity. Nawangwe’s actions epitomize this toxic environment, where educational imperatives are sacrificed at the altar of political expediency.
In a rare moment of clarity, Speaker Anita Among has spoken out against Nawangwe’s tyrannical overreach, emphasizing the importance of academic freedom and critical engagement. Her condemnation of Nawangwe’s actions exposes the vast chasm between political rhetoric and administrative reality. Yet, her voice is but a whisper in the face of Nawangwe’s thunderous assault on academic freedom.
The situation at Makerere University demands a resolute defense of academic freedom—a steadfast refusal to bow to the dictates of petty tyrants. The integrity of higher education hinges on the ability of academics to challenge, critique, and question without fear of reprisal. Nawangwe’s actions pose a grave threat to this fundamental principle, and they must be met with unwavering resistance.
Dr. Robert Kakuru, Chairperson of MUASA, has called for the immediate dismantling of Nawangwe’s inquisition, labeling it a brazen intrusion into academic affairs. His warning is a clarion call to arms—a rallying cry for all defenders of intellectual liberty. The academic community must stand united against Nawangwe’s onslaught, lest we consign ourselves to the abyss of intellectual darkness.
The inquiry initiated by Professor Barnabas Nawangwe is nothing short of a frontal assault on academic freedom—a grotesque perversion of higher education. It is a chilling reminder of the fragility of intellectual liberty in the face of unchecked power. As the academic community stands at the precipice, it must summon the courage to confront tyranny and defend the principles of free inquiry. The future of higher education in Uganda—and the very essence of academic freedom worldwide—hangs in the balance.
Discussion about this post