The Marriage Bill 2024, spearheaded by Sarah Opendi, MP for Tororo District, is yet another idiotic attempt by Uganda’s Parliament to meddle in the private lives of citizens. This horrendous bill, wrapped in the guise of so-called progressiveness, is nothing but a bundle of impractical, invasive, and draconian regulations that expose the legislative body’s utter stupidity and their complete failure to focus on the real issues plaguing this struggling nation.
Clause 87, which criminalizes the demand for the return of gifts exchanged between spouses, is a pathetic addition that shows just how delusional and clueless these lawmakers really are. Are gifts in a marriage truly the priority of a country being ripped apart by poverty, rampant unemployment, and institutionalized corruption? The fact that this circus of a Parliament is actually considering penalizing such trivial matters with fines up to Shs10 million or a ridiculous three-year prison sentence reveals how laughably misguided they are. Why should a marriage gift—a private affair—become a criminal offense in the eyes of the law? It’s nothing short of a blatant overreach, turning personal disputes into a legal playground for the state. Instead of protecting spouses, this provision lays the foundation for opportunistic lawsuits and unnecessary court cases that will do nothing but choke the already overburdened judiciary.
Clause 41 is equally outrageous. It proposes that a marriage should be consummated within six months, or else it risks being voided. The sheer idiocy behind Opendi and her colleagues’ decision to put a time limit on intimacy shows a disturbing disregard for the complexities of human relationships. What’s next? Will police be dispatched to people’s homes to ensure they’ve had sex? This sort of gross intrusion into marital privacy is not only idiotic but also deeply insulting to the dignity of couples. It reduces marriage to a rigid contractual obligation rather than a relationship built on trust, affection, and mutual respect. One wonders what kind of warped, twisted minds could produce such a clause.
As for the so-called women’s empowerment under Clause 43, it is nothing but a worthless gesture that barely scratches the surface of women’s rights. Allowing women to retain their maiden names during marriage is hardly a revolutionary proposal and falls miserably short of addressing the actual issues Ugandan women face daily, like being battered by abusive partners, being exploited economically, and being denied basic access to education. This symbolic clause is just another shiny distraction to mask the real inequalities that continue to grind women into the dirt in this country.
The bill’s attempt to tackle bigamy and false claims of marriage is another brainless addition that adds yet more layers of bureaucratic nonsense to an already dysfunctional system. Instead of wasting time on policing marital statuses, these clueless idiots in Parliament should focus on addressing electoral fraud, fixing our crippled healthcare system, and dealing with child labor. Even the penalties proposed for child marriages, which include ten years in prison, seem utterly detached from reality. Sure, punishing child marriages is crucial, but how do you enforce it in a country where corruption is the real law of the land?
And then there’s the National Marriage Register—a grotesque idea that only serves to expand the government’s bloated surveillance machine. Forcing citizens to pay fees just to access their own marriage records is a blatant money-grabbing scheme that stinks of extortion. Sarah Opendi and her cronies should be disgusted with themselves for pushing a bill that not only trivializes marriage but seeks to profit off it at every turn.
Discussion about this post