Uganda’s Parliament, once a beacon of democratic hope and legislative rigor, has plunged into disgrace under the abysmal leadership of Rt. Hon. Anita Among. As the sounds of transformation echo through its hallways, it becomes imperative for Among to swallow her colossal ego and scrutinize the substantial notes left by her predecessors, Rebecca Kadaga and Edward Ssekandi. This moment is not just opportune; it’s a desperate necessity to salvage her rapidly disintegrating career.
Among stands at the crossroads of catastrophic failure and a faint glimmer of redemption, clutching the remnants of a legacy shattered by her gross incompetence and blatant corruption. Unlike Kadaga and Ssekandi, whose strategic governance and intelligence provided a foundation for sound legislative procedures, Among’s tenure has been marked by an alarming decline in respect and functionality of the August House. Kadaga and Ssekandi, despite grappling with corruption scandals, managed to navigate through turbulent seas with their reputations relatively intact. They preserved a semblance of decorum and dignity within Parliament—a stark contrast to Among’s despotic regime.
Under Kadaga’s stewardship, Parliament was a beacon of respect and a platform where Ugandan voices found representation. Kadaga gained international acclaim, becoming a global symbol for Ugandan women and a staunch advocate for human rights. Even amidst incidents of security forces hijacking Parliament, Kadaga’s leadership ensured that such crises did not escalate to catastrophic levels. In stark contrast, Among’s era has seen a total erosion of this respect. Parliament has been reduced to a mere shadow of its former self, hijacked by corruption and her tyrannical governance.
Among’s interactions with Members of Parliament (MPs) have been nothing short of tyrannical. Treating elected representatives like misbehaving children, she has demonstrated a gross lack of respect for the very institution she is supposed to lead. Unlike Kadaga, who maintained a delicate balance and fought hard to avoid public conflicts, Among’s confrontational and vindictive nature has alienated many MPs. Her regime is characterized by open accusations of corruption, a public spectacle of dishonesty that has severely tarnished the image of Parliament.
Sanctioned by Western countries for her alleged involvement in corrupt activities, Among’s leadership is a testament to her dishonesty and inefficiency. Her blatant disregard for ethical governance has cast a dark shadow over Parliament, leading to an unprecedented demand for her resignation. The March to Parliament protest on March 23 marked a historic first: a direct public outcry for the resignation of a Speaker due to corruption allegations. Under her watch, Parliament has been cynically labeled a “house of deals,” signifying its fall from grace.
Videos of MPs expressing fear of retaliation for speaking out against corruption highlight the toxic environment Among has cultivated. Her influence over security forces, directing them to arrest dissenting Ugandans, mirrors the tactics of a tyrant rather than a democratic leader. This misuse of power has likened her to the infamous Marie Antoinette, further eroding public trust and respect.
Among’s iron-fisted approach, reminiscent of dictatorial regimes, has not only damaged her reputation but also the integrity of Parliament. Her tenure is a grim chapter in the history of Uganda’s Parliamentary Speakers, characterized by unprecedented public demands for her resignation. Unlike her predecessors, who dealt with accusations of blackmail with a degree of subtlety, Among’s overt displays of power and corruption have set a new low.
In the face of this dire situation, Among’s decision to revisit Kadaga and Ssekandi’s notes is more than a symbolic gesture; it’s a lifeline. To salvage what’s left of her tenure, she must confront the corruption head-on, enact stringent anti-corruption policies, and foster a culture of transparency and accountability. Drawing from Ssekandi’s astute governance and Kadaga’s capacity to maintain respect amidst controversy, she might find a roadmap to redemption.
However, the obstacles are immense, and time is not on her side. Whether Among can rise above her shortcomings and steer Parliament toward a brighter future remains uncertain. What is certain is that her leadership has plunged the institution into a crisis of legitimacy, one that only decisive and sincere actions can begin to resolve. The legacy she leaves will either be one of profound failure or an unlikely redemption—if she has the courage to change her ways.
Discussion about this post