The recent census conducted by the Uganda Bureau of Statistics (Ubos) has been an unmitigated disaster, revealing a level of incompetence and disorganization that is both shocking and inexcusable. Despite having a decade to prepare and a budget of Shs333 billion, Ubos has spectacularly failed in its duty, leading to widespread chaos and dissatisfaction. This critical analysis exposes the myriad failings of Ubos, shedding light on the depth of its ineptitude and the urgent need for accountability and reform.
In a farcical display of deflection and excuse-making, Executive Director of Ubos, Mr. Chris Mukiza, took to the airwaves on Capital Gang, a popular radio show, to explain away the census catastrophe. Mukiza’s defense was a masterclass in finger-pointing, targeting politicians, specifically mayors in Kampala, for allegedly introducing unauthorized “backdoor enumerators.” This laughable explanation only serves to highlight Ubos’s shocking lack of foresight and control. How could an organization with ten years to plan fail so spectacularly to prevent such obvious political interference?
Mukiza’s insistence that he is “fully in charge” was met with derision, and rightly so. The chaotic start of the census suggests that if Mukiza is indeed in charge, his leadership is catastrophically ineffective. Social media posts read during the show, including one demanding Mukiza apologize in capital letters, underscore the public’s frustration and disbelief at the bungled process.
One of the most glaring failures of the census was the sheer neglect and mistreatment of enumerators. Reports from Katwe and other suburbs highlight that enumerators were unable to log into the system, and many had not received their promised training allowances. Some were paid a paltry Shs50,000 for the entire 10-day exercise instead of the Shs50,000 per day they were owed. This blatant disregard for the welfare of enumerators, who are essential to the success of the census, is inexcusable. Is it too much to ask for a bit of financial competence from an institution managing billions?
Ubos’s excuse that districts had not verified lists of enumerators is a weak attempt to shirk responsibility. The failure to ensure timely payment is a fundamental management error that undermines the entire process. Moreover, the tragic deaths of three enumerators, although reported to be due to natural causes, add a somber note to the litany of incompetence that characterized the exercise. Who is actually accountable here, if anyone?
Ubos had ten years and a substantial budget to prepare for the census, yet it failed to deliver. This is not the first time Uganda has witnessed such disorganization in large-scale national exercises. The local council elections in 2002 and the general elections in 2016 were both marred by similar issues, with election materials not delivered to polling stations, leading to widespread chaos. These precedents should have served as critical learning opportunities for Ubos. Instead, it appears the agency learned nothing from these past failures. Are they incapable of learning, or simply unwilling?
The comparison with other African countries is telling. Nigeria, despite being Africa’s largest economy, has struggled to conduct a census for 18 years. Liberia’s 2022 census was a disaster, with enumerators not showing up due to unpaid allowances. These examples should have prompted Ubos to anticipate potential pitfalls and plan meticulously to avoid them. Instead, the agency seemed oblivious to the realities and challenges inherent in conducting a national census. Are we destined to repeat the same mistakes over and over?
Financial mismanagement appears to be at the heart of Ubos’s failures. Conducting a census is an expensive undertaking, and securing adequate funding is crucial. While Ubos had a significant budget, its allocation and utilization remain questionable. The delay in paying enumerators and the underpayment issues indicate a severe lapse in financial oversight and management. This mismanagement not only demoralizes the workforce but also jeopardizes the accuracy and reliability of the data collected. Will anyone ever be held accountable for this mess?
The government’s role in this debacle cannot be ignored. Political interference, as highlighted by Mukiza, points to a broader issue of governance and accountability. If politicians can manipulate the process to include unauthorized personnel, it undermines the integrity of the census and the credibility of the data collected. This is a serious issue that requires immediate and stringent measures to prevent recurrence in future exercises. Will the government step up, or will this just be another chapter in the book of bureaucratic failures?
Ubos’s strategic failures are manifold. Adequate preparations, including the training of enumerators and ensuring their welfare, are fundamental to the success of any census. Ubos’s failure to anticipate and mitigate these issues speaks volumes about its lack of foresight and planning. Moreover, the agency failed to engage effectively with the public. A robust public information campaign is essential to counter misinformation and ensure maximum participation. The absence of such a campaign likely contributed to the low participation rates and the widespread dissatisfaction reported by the public. Who thought it was a good idea to ignore public engagement in such a critical exercise?
The 2024 census fiasco is a glaring example of institutional failure at the highest level. Ubos’s incompetence, coupled with political interference and financial mismanagement, has resulted in a deeply flawed process that undermines the credibility of the data collected. The agency must conduct a thorough post-mortem to identify and address these failings. More importantly, there must be accountability for those responsible for this debacle. Will heads roll, or will it be business as usual?
For future censuses, Ubos must prioritize comprehensive planning, secure and transparent financial management, and robust public engagement strategies. Learning from past mistakes and studying international best practices are crucial to avoid a repeat of this national embarrassment. Only through such measures can Ubos restore public confidence and ensure that future censuses are conducted efficiently and effectively. Is there hope for a better-managed census in the future, or is this just wishful thinking?
The Ugandan public deserves better than the shambolic display witnessed in the 2024 census. It is imperative that Ubos, and the government as a whole, take concrete steps to address these issues and prevent such a colossal failure from occurring again. The lack of effective preparation, coupled with poor leadership and gross mismanagement of funds, has resulted in a national embarrassment that could have been avoided with proper oversight and planning. Ubos’s failure to secure and distribute funds, ensure the welfare of enumerators, and engage with the public has led to widespread dissatisfaction and distrust in the process. Can we really trust this institution with our national data?
Moving forward, it is crucial for Ubos to address these issues and implement measures to ensure that future censuses are conducted efficiently and effectively. This includes securing adequate funding, ensuring the welfare of enumerators, and engaging with the public to ensure maximum participation and accurate data collection. Will Ubos learn from its mistakes, or will history repeat itself?
The 2024 census debacle serves as a stark reminder of the importance of proper planning and oversight in large-scale national exercises. Ubos must take concrete steps to address these issues and restore public confidence in the census process. The Ugandan public deserves better, and it is imperative that Ubos and the government take immediate action to prevent such a colossal failure from occurring again. Will they rise to the occasion, or will we continue to be mired in bureaucratic ineptitude?
Discussion about this post