What the Ever Given saga taught us about the world

You’re reading an excerpt from the Today’s WorldView newsletter. Sign up to get the rest, including news from around the globe, interesting ideas and opinions to know, sent to your inbox every weekday.

On Monday afternoon in Egypt, the tide turned. An armada of tugboats, dredgers and salvage crews had toiled for days to move the Ever Given — a massive container ship that managed to get stuck between the Suez Canal’s banks last Tuesday — out of its rut. At last, it came free and lurched north toward the Bitter Lakes, where authorities could inspect the skyscraper-sized vessel without impeding maritime traffic.

The mishap had led to the ship choking off the Suez Canal, a man-made strait that sees more than a tenth of all global shipping pass through every year, for almost a week. While it provided no end of memes and mirth on social media, the blockage cost an estimated $9.6 billion in daily delays and served as a reminder of the extent to which the global economy still moves on sea — that is, about of 70 percent of all international trade.

It’s a global story. Egyptian President Abdel Fatah al-Sissi hailed the freeing of the vessel as a national success for his countrymen. “He portrayed the efforts as a patriotic victory that assured the world that Egypt could be trusted with overseeing the 13 percent of all global trade that passes through the crucial waterway,” my colleagues noted.

Image without a caption

Yet the dramatis personae of the whole episode represented a veritable floating — or in this instance, perhaps, “refloating” — United Nations. Consider the mammoth container ship itself: The MV Ever Given was owned by a company in Japan, operated by a container shipping firm based in Taiwan, managed by a German company and registered in Panama.

The ship’s journey saw it conveying goods from Asia to Europe, specifically the Dutch port of Rotterdam. It ran aground amid a Middle Eastern sandstorm and was rescued by a multinational coalition that included Japanese and Dutch salvage teams and local Egyptian tugboat operators.

The ship’s ordeal also highlighted the fragility of the global economy. A century and a half ago, the opening of the Suez Canal heralded an era of global fast shipping that has only accelerated in the decades since. Over the past half- century, meanwhile, capacity on cargo ships has mushroomed by about 1,500 percent, expanding the range of available consumer goods and lowering prices around the world, as Peter Goodman of the New York Times observed.

But those increases in size are creating bottlenecks in highly trafficked arteries such as the Suez Canal. “The ships today are bigger than they used to be,” a pilot working for the Suez Canal Authority told my colleagues, saying that navigating vessels such as the Ever Given through the canal was becoming more taxing. “This is something new. We haven’t seen this before.”

“Even shipments that don’t go through Suez will be affected, as factories wait on essential components arriving from elsewhere before they can make products to send off,” former merchant mariner Salvatore Mercogliano wrote for The Post’s Outlook section. “Gas and oil prices will spike.”

The incident also revived talk of alternate routes — from the old, far longer and more costly journey around the southern tip of Africa to the promise of a northern passage in the Arctic as melting ice at the roof of the world opens new pathways. “The incident in the Suez Canal should make everyone think about diversifying strategic sea routes amid the increasing scope of sea shipping,” Nikolai Korchunov, Russia’s envoy for international cooperation in the Arctic, said Friday.

A world of choke points. The blockage of the Suez Canal offered a potent reminder of how important a handful of key maritime passages is to the whole global economy, as well as the strategic calculations of regional powers. A crisis there, or the Panama Canal, or the Strait of Malacca, or the Strait of Hormuz would roil global markets and — depending on the context — trigger potential standoffs between rival navies.

“Unlike the U.S., which is a net exporter of crude these days, China imports nearly three-quarters of the oil it consumes, as well as about four-fifths of the iron ore it uses to fuel its frantic pace of infrastructure buildout — not to mention most of the goods exports it uses to obtain hard currency to pay for these commodities,” David Fickling and Anjani Trivedi of Bloomberg Opinion wrote.

They added: “That makes it peculiarly vulnerable to maritime blockades. The geography of east Asia means that the straits of Malacca and Singapore, plus the quasi-straits that run through the navigable stretches of the South China Sea and those separating Taiwan from the Philippines, Japan’s Okinawa islands and the Chinese mainland, are all highly vulnerable to interdictions in the event of conflict.”

“In all of these locations we should put significant focus on creating international authorities who manage them with an appreciation for their international character (the Suez and Panama canals both have well run authorities); conduct frequent drills and exercises to practice for disasters like the one that has just occurred in the Suez Canal; have internationally funded resources to make sure they can remain open in crisis (as was done on an ad hoc basis in Suez); and have an international regime with regulatory powers inspect all of them frequently,” he wrote in Time magazine.


Related Posts

Next Post

Twitter Feeds

Recommended Stories

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Create New Account!

Fill the forms bellow to register

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?